Directory Files
.. 1
Documentation 4
litmus-tests 34
scripts 11
File Size
.gitignore 7 B
linux-kernel.bell 3.2 kB 7.2 kB
linux-kernel.cfg 391 B
linux-kernel.def 4.7 kB 4.6 kB

Linux v5.4-rc3 - memory-model



This directory contains the memory consistency model (memory model, for
short) of the Linux kernel, written in the "cat" language and executable
by the externally provided "herd7" simulator, which exhaustively explores
the state space of small litmus tests.

In addition, the "klitmus7" tool (also externally provided) may be used
to convert a litmus test to a Linux kernel module, which in turn allows
that litmus test to be exercised within the Linux kernel.


Version 7.52 or higher of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be
downloaded separately:

See "herdtools7/" for installation instructions.

Note that although these tools usually provide backwards compatibility,
this is not absolutely guaranteed.  Therefore, if a later version does
not work, please try using the exact version called out above.


The memory model is used, in conjunction with "herd7", to exhaustively
explore the state space of small litmus tests.

For example, to run SB+fencembonceonces.litmus against the memory model:

  $ herd7 -conf linux-kernel.cfg litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus

Here is the corresponding output:

  Test SB+fencembonceonces Allowed
  States 3
  0:r0=0; 1:r0=1;
  0:r0=1; 1:r0=0;
  0:r0=1; 1:r0=1;
  Positive: 0 Negative: 3
  Condition exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0)
  Observation SB+fencembonceonces Never 0 3
  Time SB+fencembonceonces 0.01

The "Positive: 0 Negative: 3" and the "Never 0 3" each indicate that
this litmus test's "exists" clause can not be satisfied.

See "herd7 -help" or "herdtools7/doc/" for more information.


The "klitmus7" tool converts a litmus test into a Linux kernel module,
which may then be loaded and run.

For example, to run SB+fencembonceonces.litmus against hardware:

  $ mkdir mymodules
  $ klitmus7 -o mymodules litmus-tests/SB+fencembonceonces.litmus
  $ cd mymodules ; make
  $ sudo sh

The corresponding output includes:

  Test SB+fencembonceonces Allowed
  Histogram (3 states)
  644580  :>0:r0=1; 1:r0=0;
  644328  :>0:r0=0; 1:r0=1;
  711092  :>0:r0=1; 1:r0=1;
  Positive: 0, Negative: 2000000
  Condition exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0) is NOT validated
  Observation SB+fencembonceonces Never 0 2000000
  Time SB+fencembonceonces 0.16

The "Positive: 0 Negative: 2000000" and the "Never 0 2000000" indicate
that during two million trials, the state specified in this litmus
test's "exists" clause was not reached.

And, as with "herd7", please see "klitmus7 -help" or "herdtools7/doc/"
for more information.


	Quick-reference guide to the Linux-kernel memory model.

	Describes the memory model in detail.

	Lists common memory-ordering patterns.

	Provides background reading.

	Categorizes the relevant instructions, including memory
	references, memory barriers, atomic read-modify-write operations,
	lock acquisition/release, and RCU operations.

	More formally, this file (1) lists the subtypes of the various
	event types used by the memory model and (2) performs RCU
	read-side critical section nesting analysis.
	Specifies what reorderings are forbidden by memory references,
	memory barriers, atomic read-modify-write operations, and RCU.

	More formally, this file specifies what executions are forbidden
	by the memory model.  Allowed executions are those which
	satisfy the model's "coherence", "atomic", "happens-before",
	"propagation", and "rcu" axioms, which are defined in the file.

	Convenience file that gathers the common-case herd7 command-line

	Maps from C-like syntax to herd7's internal litmus-test
	instruction-set architecture.

	Directory containing a few representative litmus tests, which
	are listed in litmus-tests/README.  A great deal more litmus
	tests are available at
	Provides a front-end analysis of lock acquisition and release,
	for example, associating a lock acquisition with the preceding
	and following releases and checking for self-deadlock.

	More formally, this file defines a performance-enhanced scheme
	for generation of the possible reads-from and coherence order
	relations on the locking primitives.

	This file.

scripts	Various scripts, see scripts/README.


The Linux-kernel memory model (LKMM) has the following limitations:

1.	Compiler optimizations are not accurately modeled.  Of course,
	the use of READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() limits the compiler's
	ability to optimize, but under some circumstances it is possible
	for the compiler to undermine the memory model.  For more
	information, see Documentation/explanation.txt (in particular,

	Note that this limitation in turn limits LKMM's ability to
	accurately model address, control, and data dependencies.
	For example, if the compiler can deduce the value of some variable
	carrying a dependency, then the compiler can break that dependency
	by substituting a constant of that value.

2.	Multiple access sizes for a single variable are not supported,
	and neither are misaligned or partially overlapping accesses.

3.	Exceptions and interrupts are not modeled.  In some cases,
	this limitation can be overcome by modeling the interrupt or
	exception with an additional process.

4.	I/O such as MMIO or DMA is not supported.

5.	Self-modifying code (such as that found in the kernel's
	alternatives mechanism, function tracer, Berkeley Packet Filter
	JIT compiler, and module loader) is not supported.

6.	Complete modeling of all variants of atomic read-modify-write
	operations, locking primitives, and RCU is not provided.
	For example, call_rcu() and rcu_barrier() are not supported.
	However, a substantial amount of support is provided for these
	operations, as shown in the linux-kernel.def file.

	a.	When rcu_assign_pointer() is passed NULL, the Linux
		kernel provides no ordering, but LKMM models this
		case as a store release.

	b.	The "unless" RMW operations are not currently modeled:
		atomic_long_add_unless(), atomic_add_unless(),
		atomic_inc_unless_negative(), and
		atomic_dec_unless_positive().  These can be emulated
		in litmus tests, for example, by using atomic_cmpxchg().

	c.	The call_rcu() function is not modeled.  It can be
		emulated in litmus tests by adding another process that
		invokes synchronize_rcu() and the body of the callback
		function, with (for example) a release-acquire from
		the site of the emulated call_rcu() to the beginning
		of the additional process.

	d.	The rcu_barrier() function is not modeled.  It can be
		emulated in litmus tests emulating call_rcu() via
		(for example) a release-acquire from the end of each
		additional call_rcu() process to the site of the
		emulated rcu-barrier().

	e.	Although sleepable RCU (SRCU) is now modeled, there
		are some subtle differences between its semantics and
		those in the Linux kernel.  For example, the kernel
		might interpret the following sequence as two partially
		overlapping SRCU read-side critical sections:

			 1  r1 = srcu_read_lock(&my_srcu);
			 2  do_something_1();
			 3  r2 = srcu_read_lock(&my_srcu);
			 4  do_something_2();
			 5  srcu_read_unlock(&my_srcu, r1);
			 6  do_something_3();
			 7  srcu_read_unlock(&my_srcu, r2);

		In contrast, LKMM will interpret this as a nested pair of
		SRCU read-side critical sections, with the outer critical
		section spanning lines 1-7 and the inner critical section
		spanning lines 3-5.

		This difference would be more of a concern had anyone
		identified a reasonable use case for partially overlapping
		SRCU read-side critical sections.  For more information,
		please see:

	f.	Reader-writer locking is not modeled.  It can be
		emulated in litmus tests using atomic read-modify-write

The "herd7" tool has some additional limitations of its own, apart from
the memory model:

1.	Non-trivial data structures such as arrays or structures are
	not supported.	However, pointers are supported, allowing trivial
	linked lists to be constructed.

2.	Dynamic memory allocation is not supported, although this can
	be worked around in some cases by supplying multiple statically
	allocated variables.

Some of these limitations may be overcome in the future, but others are
more likely to be addressed by incorporating the Linux-kernel memory model
into other tools.

Finally, please note that LKMM is subject to change as hardware, use cases,
and compilers evolve.